Letters to the Editor
Disgraceful behavior
I am no fool and am certainly aware of the bias that exists in the Jewish community in Kansas City as well as the whole country in favor of the Democratic Party and President Obama. However, it is with profound disgust that I learned that in response to a recently published conservative article written by my wife Shoula Romano Horing, people have angrily called the editor to complain about her point of view being aired and some have actually canceled their subscriptions to The Chronicle.
Those who have complained and canceled subscriptions are a disgrace and should be ashamed of themselves. This is not the former Soviet Union ,China or Cuba. As every elementary student knows, freedom of the press and freedom of speech are guaranteed by our constitution. If you disagree with Ms. Horing the American response should be to make the effort to write and raise sensible arguments refuting her opinions, not censoring them by trying to blackmail The Chronicle not to publish her columns ever again.
Members of the Jewish community who blindly support President Obama and the Democratic Party against their own interests should beware. If re-elected, Obama, without the restraints of needing to run again, will fundamentally and negatively change this country for years to come in a way that will not promote the interests of the Jewish people, the country as a whole, or Israel. Although I pray for a Romney victory to save our country, an Obama victory will give you disgraceful fools the leader you deserve.
Michael Horing
Kansas City, Mo.
Democrats hostile toward Israel
The hostility toward Israel of the Democratic Party leadership became starkly revealed at its nationally televised Wednesday afternoon convention session. Even the most ardent, lifelong Jewish Democrat must have felt a chill run down the spine at the ugly, raucous sight.
The 2012 Democratic Party platform revised the 2008 version by deleting mention of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, deleting the promise that Israel need not return to the 1967 borders, deleting mention that Hamas must reject terrorism, and deleting mention that Palestinians have no right of return to Israel.
This raises the obvious question, why? Why would the framers of the platform choose to gratuitously insult its Jewish bloc of supporters at a time when a razor-close election requires every one of their votes? The answer became clearly manifest, right there on the television screen.
The Democratic Party is now captive to its most extreme left wing, the pro-Palestinian wing that openly despises Israel. These are ideologues for whom principle trumps political reality, no matter what. They now control the machinery of the Democratic Party.
The ensuing firestorm resulted in a belated attempt to repair the damage by restoring Jerusalem (and God, by the way) to the platform.
The revelatory moment came when the ayes and nays were taken. Clearly the nays prevailed. After calling for a voice vote three times, and failing to get the desired result, the chairman simply declared the revised platform passed, to prolonged boos from the delegates. The delegates wanted no single word of support for Israel in their platform, regardless of consequences with the Jewish vote.
So there it is, for all with eyes to see. Despite all the reassuring happy talk, this episode revealed to the nation the hostility toward Israel of the present Democratic leadership. This convention made the hostility openly, unarguably manifest. It is now frighteningly apparent what a second Obama term will mean to the security of Israel. The lives of half of all our co-religionists in the world are on the line. We have been warned.
Lee Levin
Overland Park, Kan.
Tired of hypocrisy
I ask your indulgence and willingness to share my response to several letters that were printed in the Sept. 6 edition of The Chronicle in response to my letter of Aug. 30.
Apparently my letter provoked some readers to object to the fact that I had expressed my feelings about a letter that was written attacking Gloria Schlossenberg’s right to express her opinion.
I’m curious why Mr. Friedman states he has no access to Mrs. Schlossenberg’s letter and yet he writes that her letter is “pure vitriol.” I can well understand his desire to defend his friend, but to deem my letter of one without substance is denying my right to voice my opinion. Fortunately, I do have an inherent ability of judging people by their past actions. Perhaps it’s really only “woman’s intuition,” so consequently I can well understand Mr. Friedman’s inability to make that assessment.
Interestingly, Marcel Matson posed a question asking “what has Carole Plesser done to save any lives?” Actually, the real question that should be asked is “how many lives have the Koch Brothers ‘environment unfriendly’ industries destroyed?”
It is hardly news that women who voice their opinion are often dismissed with unflattering words. But if a man denigrates a woman, he’s defended as “a kind and generous person.”
I strongly believe in justice and telling it “like it really is!” Quite truthfully, I’m tired of the hypocrisy.
Let’s hope The Chronicle does not fall victim to suppression of readers’ opinions since some folks may feel “uncomfortable,” and show a lack of respect for people who demonstrate a little backbone.
Carole Plesser
Prairie Village, Kan.
More than their fair share
I just wanted to express my sincere thanks to David Friedman and Marcel Matson for their kind comments, and also to Judy Press for her letter regarding the need for respect pertaining to letters published in The Chronicle.
FYI, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the statistics paid by the wealthy are as follows:
Taxes paid by highest incomes:
The top 1 percent pay 22.7 percent of taxes.
The top 10 percent pay 50 percent of taxes.
The top 20 percent pay 65.3 percent of taxes.
Do the wealthy pay more than their “fair share” of taxes? Apparently so.
Marc Birnbaum
Overland Park, Kan.
Another Holocaust?
Pirkei Avot 2:3: “Be careful in your relations with the government, for they draw no man close to themselves except for their own interests. They appear as friends when it is to their advantage, but they do not stand by a man in his time of stress.”
I often receive comments that I must be obsessed by the Holocaust, or I should stop preaching so much about the Holocaust. After all, many of my colleagues have deep feelings about the Holocaust and have lost family members.
To them I say you are correct about both. I am obsessed because at simchas I have no one from past generations to celebrate with except a few cousins. I am blessed that G-d fulfilled my promise to my parents, of blessed memory, that I would have a station wagon full of kids. My wife, kids and grandchildren are my treasure in life as I am positive the same holds true for you.
With the death of my first cousin, the Holocaust has changed for me. I do not talk about the horrors, but only ask that the memory of those lost be preserved and that we remember what our parents accomplished who came out of the Holocaust.
Now I put my efforts into helping to support Eretz Yisroel. Without the State of Israel, we Jews are in great trouble. Another Holocaust will occur if Israel is nuked. Never forget Israel only has to lose one war and Israel will be only a memory.
I do not trust politicians on either side. They will say and do anything to get your vote and then renege. I do not believe what presidential advisers or generals have to say. I believe the men and women in Israel who will fight for their survival.
Most of the world cares little for the Jews. Have we not learned from history? It is time to get out of Europe. This is my message before the High Holidays.
Rabbi Dr. Bernhard Rosenberg
Edison, N.J.